New York agrees World Trade Center 9/11 dust payout

Quote :

New York City officials have agreed to pay up to $657.5m (£437m) to thousands of rescue and clean-up workers after 9/11.

The settlement would compensate more than 10,000 plaintiffs who say they were made sick by dust at the Ground Zero site of the attacks.

At least 95% of the plaintiffs must approve the deal for it to take effect.

The money would come from a federally financed insurance fund of almost $1bn that the city controls.

The toxic cloud from the collapsed World Trade Center towers contained particles of asbestos, lead, glass and cement.

A claims adjudicator, chosen by the lawyers involved in the case, would decide on the validity of each plaintiff's claim and how much compensation they were entitled to.

Respiratory illnesses

The agreement follows a long battle in the courts, but must still be approved by a judge and agreed to by the claimants.

The announcement was made on Thursday evening by the World Trade Center Captive Insurance Company, which was set up to handle the claims of those injured in the rescue effort.

In a statement, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg called the settlement "a fair and reasonable resolution to a complex set of circumstances".

Some workers are expected to receive payments of only a few thousand dollars, while others could be in line to get more than $1m, depending on their injuries.

'Fund depleted'

The BBC's Adam Brookes, in Washington, says the agreement means that the long-running legal battle spawned by the 9/11 attacks may now be drawing to a close.

After the twin towers fell on 11 September 2001, rescuers spent weeks amid the smouldering wreckage and choking dust in Lower Manhattan, but few were adequately insured for such work.

The government set up a special insurance company to handle claims if any of them ended up injured or sick.

The claims came flooding in, many for cancer and respiratory illness caused by dust.

By early 2008, according to government documents, nearly 10,000 law suits had been filed against the insurance company.

But only six claims were paid out.

Lawyers for the city had claimed it did its best to provide respiratory equipment for workers, and challenged some claims as being based on flimsy medical evidence.

Marc Bern, a senior partner with the law firm which negotiated the deal, said: "We are gratified that these heroic men and women who performed their duties without consideration of the health implications will finally receive just compensation for their pain and suffering."

It is thought that the long courts battle has depleted the $1bn fund created by Congress to help insure the city, with the legal bill so far running to more than $200m.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8563554.stm

I don't know what to say to this one....... I'm a bit iffy on it. I mean, sure, if I was a worker, I would want to be paid for my heroic act and service. Yet, I feel, why can't they just pay for the worker's hospital bill instead? Why do they have to go through the troubles of assigning a number of dollars to them? You are giving them money to pay for their illness, if you give them a check instead, you honestly think they will spend it on themselves like they were supposed to. Yes, some will argue, it's their money, they can do whatever they want with it... yet, the government is giving them the people's tax money FOR their health. I think it defeats the purpose if they are given the choice to use it elsewhere.

So, why give them the money when they could just easily pay their health bill, while keeping monitor of their health status.

because some people emptied there savings accounts years ago to pay there bills and don't need to pay it again.

Hm, valid point there, I didn't think of it, thank you ;D

you are welcome, you go to think from every angle.

I have you to see that angle for me~ ^__^